Captured On April 19 1775, Part I - "About Thirty Soldiers Are Prisoners"

By

The five thousand British and German soldiers who surrendered at Saratoga on October 17, 1777, were not the first prisoners of the Revolutionary War.  That distinction goes to a much smaller number who were captured or surrendered (or perhaps even deserted) on the first day of fighting at Concord and Lexington, and during the British retreat back to Boston.  Isaiah Thomas, the publisher of the Massachusetts Spy, noted in his paper that he had "escaped myself from Boston on the memorable 19th of April, 1775, which will be remembered in future as the Anniversary of the BATTLE of LEXINGTON!", and once relocated in Worcester, Massachusetts, published an account of the fighting which noted: "Lieut. Gould of the 4th regiment, who is wounded, and Lieut. Potter of the Marines, and about thirty soldiers, are prisoners." [1]

This engraving by Amos Doolittle depicts Provincial and British troops firing at each other across the North Bridge in Concord.
The exact number of British soldiers taken as prisoners appears to be unknown, but "about thirty" is likely close to the truth.  Professor T. Cole Jones, author of Captives of Liberty, notes in his dissertation on prisoners of war in the American Revolution that the count ranged from twenty-four as reported by British Lieutenant-General Thomas Gage, twenty-eight according to Major-General William Heath is his post-war memoir, while "...Israel Putnam’s statement that “70 or 80" men were taken was almost certainly too optimistic." [2]  A history of the Battle of Lexington published fifty years after the start of the war indicates the total number of prisoners taken was either twenty-eight, or, by an "English account", twenty-six. [3]

The identity of the first British soldier taken prisoner by Provincial forces also appears to be unknown.  Lieutenant Edward Thornton Gould, of the 4th or "His Majesty's Own" Regiment of Foot, was one of those who was captured on the 19th.  Gould was wounded in the fighting at the North Bridge in Concord, shown above in a close-up of one of the four engraving of the fight by Amos Doolittle (available online in the collection of the New York Public Library).  Gould seems like he would be a good candidate for the title of the first prisoner taken by the Americans, but he wasn't.   

A reenactor in a scarlet coat, white breeches and leather helmet depicts a light infantry officer of the British 4th Regiment of Foot.
Gould, a light infantry officer whose appearance that day would have been similar to that of the reenactor depicted here at the 2024 "Battle Road" event at Minute Man National Historical Park, was among those whose sworn statements were taken by agents of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress.  His account of the day was included in the pamphlet entitled A Narrative, Of The Excursion and Ravages Of The King's Troops Under the Command of General Gage, On the nineteenth of April, 1775.  Gould testified that he marched with the column of grenadiers and light infantry sent to Concord, saw the militia on the Lexington Green dispersing as British troops approached (but wasn't able to say who fired first), and that he was wounded during the fighting at the North Bridge in Concord. [4]  

Although Gould was wounded at the North Bridge, he wasn't captured there.  Rather, as shared by J.L. Bell in his Boston 1775 blog post from April 18, 2009, Gould commandeered a carriage to take him back to Boston after being wounded, and was captured in Menotomy - present day Arlington.

Sylvanus Wood of Woburn, Massachusetts, claimed to have taken the first prisoner of the Revolutionary War.  Wood, according to a history of the town of Woburn, was following the British column after it left Lexington Green and saw a British soldier leave its ranks.  Wood "hastened up to him while he was alone" it was said, ordered the soldier to surrender, disarmed him, and then sent him off in the custody of another man who took him back to Lexington.  Although the Woburn history does not provide any information as to who the captive was, it relates the tale that the captured soldier, "having a supply of British gold in his pockets", was able to bribe his way to freedom, and something that the author describes as "conjecture". [5]  

Wood's own account of the incident, in his 1830 pension application, indicates that he stood with the Lexington militia on the Green, and after the firing stopped helped carry the dead into the meetinghouse before setting out after the enemy, towards Concord.  Then, before arriving in Concord, Wood related that he encountered "one of the grenadiers standing sentinel".  Wood goes on to say that he cocked his firelock, ran up to the man, seized his musket with his left hand, and disarmed the grenadier.  Wood doesn't say how he either surprised the soldier, or why the soldier allowed an armed militiaman to approach so close after British and Provincial troops had already exchanged fire that day. [6]  Another secondary account indicates that the man Wood captured was Private Samuel Lee of the 18th Regiment of Foot, who though deaf or hearing impaired, had been posted as a sentry while British troops searched for supplies in Concord. [7]

As there are multiple accounts regarding the taking of prisoners, and they are not precise as to the exact time of capture, the identity of the first British soldier prisoner seems to be impossible to determine.  Whatever the total count of prisoners taken that day was, it could have been higher.  Thomas Thorp, who fought that day with the Acton militia, testified years later that after he and his comrades returned fire at the North Bridge in Concord, and those British troops who had been left to hold the bridge fell back, Provincial troops re-crossed the bridge, "... but did not form in any order.  As we stood there, the [British] detachment from Col. Barrett's returned, and passed us, and might easily have been taken prisoners if we had not been in such confusion." [8]  Thorp's account may also hold the answer to who the first prisoner taken may have been, and what happened to him - a story for next week when we look at how those who were taken prisoner were treated.

[1] Massachusetts Spy, Worcester, MA, May 3, 1775.
[2] Trenton Cole Jones, "Deprived of Their Liberty" (PhD diss., Johns Hopkins University, 2014), 65.
[3] Elias Phinney, History of the Battle of Lexington (Boston, MA: Phelps and Farnham,1825), 30.
[4] A Narrative of the Excursion and Ravages of the King’s Troop Under the Command of General Gage On the nineteenth of April, 1775 (Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas, 1775), no page numbers.
[5] Samuel Sewall, The History of Woburn, Middlesex County, Mass. From The Grant Of Its Territory To Charlestown, in 1640, to The Year 1860 (Boston, MA: Wiggin and Lunt, 1868), 363-364. 
[6] John C. Dann, ed., "The Revolution Remembered" (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980), 6-8.
[7] "The First Prisoner of War (or possibly the First Deserter) of the American Revolution", accessed April 16, 2024, https://www.varsitytutors.com/earlyamerica/early-america-review/volume-12/first-pow.
[8] Josiah Adams, Letter to Lemuel Shattuck... In Vindication of the Claims of Capt. Isaac Davis of Acton (Boston, MA: Damrell & Moore, 1850), 15.


For more on the Convention Army's 1777 march from Saratoga to Boston, see:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

General John Burgoyne and Taylor Swift - "Built To Perfection"

By
Image
In my first post on this blog , I reserved the right to stray now and then from the 1777 line of march of the Convention Army.  I didn't expect that it would take me to pop music star Taylor Swift .  It has though, by way of a report that she was purchasing a house in Kinderhook, New York, that hosted British Lieutenant-General John Burgoyne after his surrender at Saratoga, while on his way to confinement in Cambridge, Massachusetts. First off, the story is said to be false.  An August 15, 2023,  article in the Albany Times Union clarified that it was only a rumor that Swift was buying a house in Kinderhook, where a historical marker out front indicates  Burgoyne stayed on October 22, 1777 . According to the Times Union article, a local middle-school principle posted on his Facebook page that:  “It appears that Taylor Swift may become our neighbor. If the rumor is true, she has recently purchased the historic Burgoyne House across from the old Martin Van Buren Elementary School...
Read more

George Washington and Saratoga - "A Matter Of Such Magnitude"

By
Image
February 22, 2023, marks the 291st anniversary of the birth of George Washington, pictured here in a  Library of Congress  print published in Germany in 1777 or 1778.  For more than two centuries Washington's birth has been widely noted, and was a federally recognized holiday from 1885 to 1971.  For the last five decades an all encompassing "Presidents' Day" has supplanted not only a holiday observance on the date of Washington's birth, but the February 12th celebration of the birthday of another truly great American President, Abraham Lincoln. In the fall of 1777 Washington hands were full as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army.  While Major-General Horatio Gates defended the upper Hudson River Valley, Washington was responding to British General Sir William Howe's expedition moving not north to support Burgoyne, but south by ship into the Chesapeake Bay and then north by land to Philadelphia.  On September 11th British forces maneuvered to flank Washi
Read more

Burgoyne's Artillery - "Drawn Through The Village"

By
Image
Lieutenant-General John Burgoyne's British and German troops marched out of their camp and entrenchments at Saratoga on the morning of October 17, 1777, and left their arms and artillery at  "the verge of the river where the old fort stood."  [1]   Supposedly, "With a moist eye the artilleryman looked for the last time upon his faithful gun parting with it as he would from a bride - and that, forever!"  [2]  For the American army, the surrendered artillery was something to be secured, inventoried, and redistributed for use in future battles against their former owners.   A German office would note:  "England's greatest loss may be considered the loss of the  artillery, which was taken by the rebels."  - though Britain's loss of an army, the boost to American morale, and the resulting alliance between the United States and France was surely more significant. [3]   An account of  the Convention Army's stop in Great Barrington includes a stor
Read more